A bipolar-argumentation framework jointly selects models and counterfactuals so that returned counterfactuals are valid on all selected models, at the cost of majority voting.
RobustX: Robust Counterfactual Explanations Made Easy
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The increasing use of Machine Learning (ML) models to aid decision-making in high-stakes industries demands explainability to facilitate trust. Counterfactual Explanations (CEs) are ideally suited for this, as they can offer insights into the predictions of an ML model by illustrating how changes in its input data may lead to different outcomes. However, for CEs to realise their explanatory potential, significant challenges remain in ensuring their robustness under slight changes in the scenario being explained. Despite the widespread recognition of CEs' robustness as a fundamental requirement, a lack of standardised tools and benchmarks hinders a comprehensive and effective comparison of robust CE generation methods. In this paper, we introduce RobustX, an open-source Python library implementing a collection of CE generation and evaluation methods, with a focus on the robustness property. RobustX provides interfaces to several existing methods from the literature, enabling streamlined access to state-of-the-art techniques. The library is also easily extensible, allowing fast prototyping of novel robust CE generation and evaluation methods.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Argumentative Ensembling for Robust Recourse under Model Multiplicity
A bipolar-argumentation framework jointly selects models and counterfactuals so that returned counterfactuals are valid on all selected models, at the cost of majority voting.