LLMs produce interpretive closure in 87.5% of ambiguous social scenarios through narrative alignment, reversal, or normative advice, with first-person perspectives increasing alignment tendencies.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03948
2 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 2 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
2
external citations · external index
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
A literature review shows that constructs for appropriate reliance on AI are fragmented, presents three views on the topic, and calls for consensus on objective metrics to enable better comparisons across studies.
citing papers explorer
-
What Did They Mean? How LLMs Resolve Ambiguous Social Situations across Perspectives and Roles
LLMs produce interpretive closure in 87.5% of ambiguous social scenarios through narrative alignment, reversal, or normative advice, with first-person perspectives increasing alignment tendencies.
-
From Trust to Appropriate Reliance: Measurement Constructs in Human-AI Decision-Making
A literature review shows that constructs for appropriate reliance on AI are fragmented, presents three views on the topic, and calls for consensus on objective metrics to enable better comparisons across studies.