Unmodified mixtures of experts can provide predictive uncertainty estimates via entropy, mutual information, and expert-variance, and these estimates outperform a two-expert average ensemble on conditional correctness metrics under out-of-distribution data.
Training of Neural Networks with Uncertain Data: A Mixture of Experts Approach
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This paper introduces the "Uncertainty-aware Mixture of Experts" (uMoE), a novel solution aimed at addressing aleatoric uncertainty within Neural Network (NN) based predictive models. While existing methodologies primarily concentrate on managing uncertainty during inference, uMoE uniquely embeds uncertainty into the training phase. Employing a "Divide and Conquer" strategy, uMoE strategically partitions the uncertain input space into more manageable subspaces. It comprises Expert components, individually trained on their respective subspace uncertainties. Overarching the Experts, a Gating Unit, leveraging additional information regarding the distribution of uncertain in-puts across these subspaces, dynamically adjusts the weighting to minimize deviations from ground truth. Our findings demonstrate the superior performance of uMoE over baseline methods in effectively managing data uncertainty. Furthermore, through a comprehensive robustness analysis, we showcase its adaptability to varying uncertainty levels and propose optimal threshold parameters. This innovative approach boasts broad applicability across diverse da-ta-driven domains, including but not limited to biomedical signal processing, autonomous driving, and production quality control.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Extracting Uncertainty Estimates from Mixtures of Experts for Semantic Segmentation
Unmodified mixtures of experts can provide predictive uncertainty estimates via entropy, mutual information, and expert-variance, and these estimates outperform a two-expert average ensemble on conditional correctness metrics under out-of-distribution data.