Human experiments show explanation methods for text classification have distinct strengths: LIME is best at justifying predictions, LRP with n-grams best supports checking uncertain ones, and no method reliably reveals irrational model behavior.
iNNvestigate neural networks!
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In recent years, deep neural networks have revolutionized many application domains of machine learning and are key components of many critical decision or predictive processes. Therefore, it is crucial that domain specialists can understand and analyze actions and pre- dictions, even of the most complex neural network architectures. Despite these arguments neural networks are often treated as black boxes. In the attempt to alleviate this short- coming many analysis methods were proposed, yet the lack of reference implementations often makes a systematic comparison between the methods a major effort. The presented library iNNvestigate addresses this by providing a common interface and out-of-the- box implementation for many analysis methods, including the reference implementation for PatternNet and PatternAttribution as well as for LRP-methods. To demonstrate the versatility of iNNvestigate, we provide an analysis of image classifications for variety of state-of-the-art neural network architectures.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Human-grounded Evaluations of Explanation Methods for Text Classification
Human experiments show explanation methods for text classification have distinct strengths: LIME is best at justifying predictions, LRP with n-grams best supports checking uncertain ones, and no method reliably reveals irrational model behavior.