Pith. sign in

Instruct Once, Chat Consistently in Multiple Rounds: An Efficient Tuning Framework for Dialogue

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Tuning language models for dialogue generation has been a prevalent paradigm for building capable dialogue agents. Yet, traditional tuning narrowly views dialogue generation as resembling other language generation tasks, ignoring the role disparities between two speakers and the multi-round interactive process that dialogues ought to be. Such a manner often leads to unsatisfactory chat consistency for the built agent. In this work, we emphasize the interactive, communicative nature of dialogue and argue that it is more feasible to model the speaker roles of agent and user separately, enabling the agent to adhere to its role consistently. With this in mind, we propose an efficient Multi-round Interactive Dialogue Tuning (Midi-Tuning) framework. It models the agent and user individually with two adapters built upon large language models. The adapters make use of respective utterances round by round in alternating order and they are tuned via a round-level memory caching mechanism. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, our framework performs superior to traditional fine-tuning and harbors the tremendous potential for improving dialogue consistency.

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Multi-Party Conversational Agents: A Survey

cs.CL · 2025-05-24 · conditional · novelty 4.0

A survey of multi-party conversational AI that organizes tasks into state-of-mind modeling, semantic understanding, and action modeling, and argues that theory of mind is the key missing ingredient.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Multi-Party Conversational Agents: A Survey cs.CL · 2025-05-24 · conditional · none · ref 18 · internal anchor

    A survey of multi-party conversational AI that organizes tasks into state-of-mind modeling, semantic understanding, and action modeling, and argues that theory of mind is the key missing ingredient.