Pith. sign in

Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervals

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Due to the increasing deployment of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) in real-world security-critical domains including autonomous vehicles and collision avoidance systems, formally checking security properties of DNNs, especially under different attacker capabilities, is becoming crucial. Most existing security testing techniques for DNNs try to find adversarial examples without providing any formal security guarantees about the non-existence of such adversarial examples. Recently, several projects have used different types of Satisfiability Modulo Theory (SMT) solvers to formally check security properties of DNNs. However, all of these approaches are limited by the high overhead caused by the solver. In this paper, we present a new direction for formally checking security properties of DNNs without using SMT solvers. Instead, we leverage interval arithmetic to compute rigorous bounds on the DNN outputs. Our approach, unlike existing solver-based approaches, is easily parallelizable. We further present symbolic interval analysis along with several other optimizations to minimize overestimations of output bounds. We design, implement, and evaluate our approach as part of ReluVal, a system for formally checking security properties of Relu-based DNNs. Our extensive empirical results show that ReluVal outperforms Reluplex, a state-of-the-art solver-based system, by 200 times on average. On a single 8-core machine without GPUs, within 4 hours, ReluVal is able to verify a security property that Reluplex deemed inconclusive due to timeout after running for more than 5 days. Our experiments demonstrate that symbolic interval analysis is a promising new direction towards rigorously analyzing different security properties of DNNs.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2019 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Metric Learning for Adversarial Robustness

cs.LG · 2019-09-03 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Adding a triplet loss with semi-hard negative sampling to adversarial training improves robustness and adversarial-example detection on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Tiny ImageNet.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Metric Learning for Adversarial Robustness cs.LG · 2019-09-03 · conditional · none · ref 43 · internal anchor

    Adding a triplet loss with semi-hard negative sampling to adversarial training improves robustness and adversarial-example detection on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Tiny ImageNet.