LLM-based pre-publication idea quality scoring on 6208 economics papers shows execution sets a meritocratic floor, idea quality grades intermediate rungs, and connections provide a bounded advantage mainly at top journals.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Controlled prompt interventions reveal strong affiliation bias in LLM peer reviews favoring top-ranked institutions, plus effects from seniority and publication history.
A survey synthesizing LLM methods for peer review critique generation and score prediction, including taxonomies, benchmark limitations, domain biases, and robustness risks such as prompt injection.
citing papers explorer
-
Merit or networks? What decides where research is published
LLM-based pre-publication idea quality scoring on 6208 economics papers shows execution sets a meritocratic floor, idea quality grades intermediate rungs, and connections provide a bounded advantage mainly at top journals.
-
Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviews
Controlled prompt interventions reveal strong affiliation bias in LLM peer reviews favoring top-ranked institutions, plus effects from seniority and publication history.
-
LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challenges
A survey synthesizing LLM methods for peer review critique generation and score prediction, including taxonomies, benchmark limitations, domain biases, and robustness risks such as prompt injection.