GPT-4 showed high recall but low precision in analogical matching for strategic problems, while humans showed the reverse, implying complementary roles for AI and human judgment.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Can LLMs Help Improve Analogical Reasoning For Strategic Decisions? Experimental Evidence from Humans and GPT-4
GPT-4 showed high recall but low precision in analogical matching for strategic problems, while humans showed the reverse, implying complementary roles for AI and human judgment.