CLEMO fits local linear explanations for optimization models, adding a regularizer so predicted objective values match the objective of predicted decisions and predicted decisions stay feasible.
Counterfactual Explanations for Linear Optimization
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The concept of counterfactual explanations (CE) has emerged as one of the important concepts to understand the inner workings of complex AI systems. In this paper, we translate the idea of CEs to linear optimization and propose, motivate, and analyze three different types of CEs: strong, weak, and relative. While deriving strong and weak CEs appears to be computationally intractable, we show that calculating relative CEs can be done efficiently. By detecting and exploiting the hidden convex structure of the optimization problem that arises in the latter case, we show that obtaining relative CEs can be done in the same magnitude of time as solving the original linear optimization problem. This is confirmed by an extensive numerical experiment study on the NETLIB library.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
math.OC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Coherent Local Explanations for Mathematical Optimization
CLEMO fits local linear explanations for optimization models, adding a regularizer so predicted objective values match the objective of predicted decisions and predicted decisions stay feasible.