Pith. sign in

Counterfactual Explanations for Linear Optimization

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

The concept of counterfactual explanations (CE) has emerged as one of the important concepts to understand the inner workings of complex AI systems. In this paper, we translate the idea of CEs to linear optimization and propose, motivate, and analyze three different types of CEs: strong, weak, and relative. While deriving strong and weak CEs appears to be computationally intractable, we show that calculating relative CEs can be done efficiently. By detecting and exploiting the hidden convex structure of the optimization problem that arises in the latter case, we show that obtaining relative CEs can be done in the same magnitude of time as solving the original linear optimization problem. This is confirmed by an extensive numerical experiment study on the NETLIB library.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

math.OC 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

support 1

representative citing papers

Coherent Local Explanations for Mathematical Optimization

math.OC · 2025-02-07 · conditional · novelty 6.0

CLEMO fits local linear explanations for optimization models, adding a regularizer so predicted objective values match the objective of predicted decisions and predicted decisions stay feasible.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Coherent Local Explanations for Mathematical Optimization math.OC · 2025-02-07 · conditional · none · ref 22 · internal anchor

    CLEMO fits local linear explanations for optimization models, adding a regularizer so predicted objective values match the objective of predicted decisions and predicted decisions stay feasible.