Ray-tracing comparisons show FR3 yields higher cell-edge data rates than FR2 under equal-aperture antennas in urban environments, with negligible coverage difference between vehicular and pedestrian user equipment.
A study of channel model parameters for aerial base stations at 2.4 GHz in different environments
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Ray-tracing shows FR3 achieves higher SNR than mmWave without interference and higher cell-edge SINR with full interference for C-V2B links when antennas have equal physical aperture.
citing papers explorer
-
FR3 for 6G Networks: A Comparative Study against FR1 and FR2 Across Diverse Environments
Ray-tracing comparisons show FR3 yields higher cell-edge data rates than FR2 under equal-aperture antennas in urban environments, with negligible coverage difference between vehicular and pedestrian user equipment.
-
Characterization of FR3 Cellular Vehicle-to-Base Station Links in HighRise Urban Scenarios
Ray-tracing shows FR3 achieves higher SNR than mmWave without interference and higher cell-edge SINR with full interference for C-V2B links when antennas have equal physical aperture.