pith. sign in

A Cognitively Grounded Bayesian Framework for Misinformation Susceptibility

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In this (work in progress) paper, we present Bounded Pragmatic Listener (or BPL), a cognitively grounded Bayesian framework for modelling susceptibility to information disorder. BPL extends Rational Speech Act theory with three cognitively motivated bounds derived from the bounded rationality literature with a) a recursion depth bound (that emphasises working memory limits);b) a prior compression parameter (which is oriented at capturing information bottleneck); and c) an availability sample size (that operationalises importance sampling with saliency-weighted proposals). This allows us to test predictions about misinformation susceptibility, annotator disagreement, and the differential vulnerability to mis-, dis-, and mal-information as defined in the Information Disorder framework. We validate BPL on the LIAR and MultiFC benchmarks showcasing competitive veracity classification and experimental support for the depth-mismatch paradox.

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

A Cognitively Grounded Bayesian Framework for Misinformation Susceptibility

cs.CL · 2026-05-10 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

BPL extends Rational Speech Act theory with recursion depth, prior compression, and availability sampling bounds to predict misinformation susceptibility, annotator disagreement, and differential effects of mis-, dis-, and mal-information, with competitive results on LIAR and MultiFC veracity tasks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • A Cognitively Grounded Bayesian Framework for Misinformation Susceptibility cs.CL · 2026-05-10 · unverdicted · none · ref 1 · internal anchor

    BPL extends Rational Speech Act theory with recursion depth, prior compression, and availability sampling bounds to predict misinformation susceptibility, annotator disagreement, and differential effects of mis-, dis-, and mal-information, with competitive results on LIAR and MultiFC veracity tasks.