Generative LSTM classifiers under post-training quantization are far more sensitive than discriminative ones to calibration data class balance and input noise, especially at 3- to 5-bit widths.
FP8-BERT: Post-Training Quantization for Transformer
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Transformer-based models, such as BERT, have been widely applied in a wide range of natural language processing tasks. However, one inevitable side effect is that they require massive memory storage and inference cost when deployed in production. Quantization is one of the popularized ways to alleviate the cost. However, the previous 8-bit quantization strategy based on INT8 data format either suffers from the degradation of accuracy in a Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) fashion or requires an expensive Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) process. Recently, a new numeric format FP8 (i.e. floating-point of 8-bits) has been proposed and supported in commercial AI computing platforms such as H100. In this paper, we empirically validate the effectiveness of FP8 as a way to do Post-Training Quantization without significant loss of accuracy, with a simple calibration and format conversion process. We adopt the FP8 standard proposed by NVIDIA Corp. (2022) in our extensive experiments of BERT variants on GLUE and SQuAD v1.1 datasets, and show that PTQ with FP8 can significantly improve the accuracy upon that with INT8, to the extent of the full-precision model.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Post-Training Quantization of Generative and Discriminative LSTM Text Classifiers: A Study of Calibration, Class Balance, and Robustness
Generative LSTM classifiers under post-training quantization are far more sensitive than discriminative ones to calibration data class balance and input noise, especially at 3- to 5-bit widths.