Participants achieved near-chance accuracy (~50%) distinguishing real from AI-generated media across four modalities, with performance declining for faces, foreign languages, single modalities, and mixed-authenticity audiovisual clips.
Warning: Humans cannot reliably detect speech deepfakes
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Humans perform at chance levels when distinguishing generative AI content from human content in text, images, and voice.
citing papers explorer
-
As Good As A Coin Toss: Human detection of AI-generated images, videos, audio, and audiovisual stimuli
Participants achieved near-chance accuracy (~50%) distinguishing real from AI-generated media across four modalities, with performance declining for faces, foreign languages, single modalities, and mixed-authenticity audiovisual clips.
-
Is it Cake or is it AI? A Systematic Review of Human Uncertainty in Distinguishing Generative Artificial Intelligence Content
Humans perform at chance levels when distinguishing generative AI content from human content in text, images, and voice.