Re-evaluating four LLM code-efficiency benchmarks with 30-run statistical testing shows 93.89% of 'performant' implementations are indistinguishable from baselines; a multi-agent test-generation framework reveals hidden significant improvements in ~24% of previously non-significant tasks.
TestEval : Benchmarking Large Language Models for Test Case Generation
3 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 18 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
18
external citations · OpenAlex
fields
cs.SE 3years
2026 3representative citing papers
SWE-Mutation benchmark shows current LLMs achieve low verification (10.20%) and detection (36.15%) rates on 2,636 mutated variants, exposing weaknesses in generating reliable test suites.
GLMTest integrates code property graphs and GNNs with LLMs to steer test case generation toward targeted branches, raising branch accuracy from 27.4% to 50.2% on the TestGenEval benchmark.
citing papers explorer
-
Rethinking Code Performance Benchmarks for LLMs
Re-evaluating four LLM code-efficiency benchmarks with 30-run statistical testing shows 93.89% of 'performant' implementations are indistinguishable from baselines; a multi-agent test-generation framework reveals hidden significant improvements in ~24% of previously non-significant tasks.
-
SWE-Mutation: Can LLMs Generate Reliable Test Suites in Software Engineering?
SWE-Mutation benchmark shows current LLMs achieve low verification (10.20%) and detection (36.15%) rates on 2,636 mutated variants, exposing weaknesses in generating reliable test suites.
-
Program Structure-aware Language Models: Targeted Software Testing beyond Textual Semantics
GLMTest integrates code property graphs and GNNs with LLMs to steer test case generation toward targeted branches, raising branch accuracy from 27.4% to 50.2% on the TestGenEval benchmark.