In a retrospective sample of 500 urgent-care telehealth visits, a proprietary AI doctor matched clinicians' top diagnosis 81% of the time and treatment plans 99.2% of the time, but the design cannot support claims of comparable clinical decision-making.
NPJ Digit Med 4: 93, 2021
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Toward the Autonomous AI Doctor: Quantitative Benchmarking of an Autonomous Agentic AI Versus Board-Certified Clinicians in a Real World Setting
In a retrospective sample of 500 urgent-care telehealth visits, a proprietary AI doctor matched clinicians' top diagnosis 81% of the time and treatment plans 99.2% of the time, but the design cannot support claims of comparable clinical decision-making.