For hereditary complete cotorsion pairs generated by a set in a Grothendieck category, the coderived category of the left class is equivalent to the contraderived category of the right class, and for sandwiched pairs this flat-type behavior is equivalent to two periodicity properties.
Models for mock homotopy categories of projectives
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Let $R$ be a ring and Ch($R$) the category of chain complexes of $R$-modules. We put an abelian model structure on Ch($R$) whose homotopy category is equivalent to $K(Proj)$, the homotopy category of all complexes of projectives. However, the cofibrant objects are not complexes of projectives, but rather all complexes of flat modules. The trivial objects are what Positselski calls contraacyclic complexes and so the homotopy category coincides with his contraderived category. We in fact construct this model on the category of chain complexes of quasi-coherent sheaves on any scheme $X$ admitting a flat generator. In this case the homotopy category recovers what Murfet calls the mock homotopy category of projectives. In the same way we construct a model for the (mock) projective stable derived category, and we use model category methods to recover the recollement of Murfet. Finally, we consider generalizations by replacing the flat cotorsion pair with other complete hereditary cotorsion pairs in Grothendieck categories.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
math.CT 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Coderived and contraderived categories for a cotorsion pair, flat-type cotorsion pairs, and relative periodicity
For hereditary complete cotorsion pairs generated by a set in a Grothendieck category, the coderived category of the left class is equivalent to the contraderived category of the right class, and for sandwiched pairs this flat-type behavior is equivalent to two periodicity properties.