NeurIPS should enforce a three-tier disclosure framework plus mandatory claim inventories for papers asserting that frontier AI models are safe or ready for release.
Frontier ai auditing: Toward rigorous third-party assessment of safety and security practices at leading ai companies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.11699
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 4roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
A framework recommending that frontier AI developers disclose information on capabilities, usage, safety mitigations, and governance of internal model deployments.
Proposes a feasibility taxonomy of 20 hardware-level AI compute governance mechanisms organized by monitoring, verification, and enforcement, with mappings to regulatory scenarios that highlight immaturity of treaty-verification tools.
Frontier AI safety policies have a structural coordination gap caused by diffuse benefits and concentrated costs, which can be addressed by adapting precommitment and shared response protocols from other high-risk domains.
citing papers explorer
-
NeurIPS Should Require Reproducibility Standards for Frontier AI Safety Claims
NeurIPS should enforce a three-tier disclosure framework plus mandatory claim inventories for papers asserting that frontier AI models are safe or ready for release.
-
What Should Frontier AI Developers Disclose About Internal Deployments?
A framework recommending that frontier AI developers disclose information on capabilities, usage, safety mitigations, and governance of internal model deployments.
-
Hardware-Level Governance of AI Compute: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Regulatory Compliance and Treaty Verification
Proposes a feasibility taxonomy of 20 hardware-level AI compute governance mechanisms organized by monitoring, verification, and enforcement, with mappings to regulatory scenarios that highlight immaturity of treaty-verification tools.
-
The coordination gap in frontier AI safety policies
Frontier AI safety policies have a structural coordination gap caused by diffuse benefits and concentrated costs, which can be addressed by adapting precommitment and shared response protocols from other high-risk domains.