Prioritization algorithms in public services generate relative disparities among intersectional groups as resources become scarce, intensifying perceptions of inequality.
Transparency, Governance and Regulation of Algorithmic Tools Deployed in the Criminal Justice System: a UK Case Study
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
A scoping review of AIES and FAccT literature concludes that AI trustworthiness research prioritizes technical precision over social, ethical, and institutional factors, leaving the sociotechnical nature of AI systems underexplored.
citing papers explorer
-
The Paradox of Prioritization in Public Sector Algorithms
Prioritization algorithms in public services generate relative disparities among intersectional groups as resources become scarce, intensifying perceptions of inequality.
-
Understanding AI Trustworthiness: A Scoping Review of AIES & FAccT Articles
A scoping review of AIES and FAccT literature concludes that AI trustworthiness research prioritizes technical precision over social, ethical, and institutional factors, leaving the sociotechnical nature of AI systems underexplored.