A review of SU(3)_F fits to B->PP decays reports a 3.6 to 5.2 sigma discrepancy with the Standard Model, hinting at new physics, but realistic SU(3) breaking remains uncalculated.
Anomalies in Hadronic $B \to VV$ Decays
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Recently, a fit of charmless $B\to PP$ decays ($B \in \{B^0, B^+, B_s^0\}$, $P \in \{ \pi, K, \eta, \eta' \}$) to the latest data was performed under the assumption of flavour SU(3) symmetry [SU(3)$_F$]. It was found that there is a $4.1\sigma$ disagreement with the SU(3)$_F$ limit of the Standard Model [$\rm SM_{SU(3)_F}$]. In this paper, we extend this analysis to charmless $B \to VV$ decays ($V \in \{\rho, K^*, \phi, \omega\}$). The fit examining $B \to \rho K^*$ decays, assuming only isospin symmetry, is found to be acceptable. When we fit to $B \to VV$ decays with $V \in \{ \rho, K^* \}$ within SU(3)$_F$, we find a $5.2\sigma$ discrepancy with SM$_{SU(3)_F}$. Finally, when $B \to VV$ decays with $V \in \{ \rho, K^*, \phi, \omega \}$ are considered, the discrepancy grows to $>7\sigma$. The theoretical input in this analysis is modest, so our results are quite rigorous, group theoretically, and hold almost exactly in the SU(3)$_F$ limit. Although it seems unlikely that the introduction of $\sim 30$% SU(3)$_F$-breaking effects can account for this discrepancy, this must be verified.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
hep-ph 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Anomalies in Hadronic $B$ Decays
A review of SU(3)_F fits to B->PP decays reports a 3.6 to 5.2 sigma discrepancy with the Standard Model, hinting at new physics, but realistic SU(3) breaking remains uncalculated.