Pith. sign in

In addition, both cases show the same absolute value for the min χ2

achieves the best results when it becomes the standard exponential F (R) model ( 7) with α = 1 · 2020

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
browse 1 citing papers

fields

gr-qc 1

years

2024 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

representative citing papers

Modified gravity/Dynamical Dark Energy vs $\Lambda$CDM: is the game over?

gr-qc · 2024-12-12 · reject · novelty 4.0

An AIC/χ² comparison of exponential F(R) gravity, wCDM, and CPL models against Pantheon+, DESI DR1, cosmic chronometer, and Planck-compressed data claims ΛCDM is excluded at 4σ, but the significance conversion is not statistically justified.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Modified gravity/Dynamical Dark Energy vs $\Lambda$CDM: is the game over? gr-qc · 2024-12-12 · reject · none · ref 8

    An AIC/χ² comparison of exponential F(R) gravity, wCDM, and CPL models against Pantheon+, DESI DR1, cosmic chronometer, and Planck-compressed data claims ΛCDM is excluded at 4σ, but the significance conversion is not statistically justified.