All chatbot-designed audio encoders failed to align with CLIP text embeddings and produced incoherent images, while showing a surprising architectural similarity across chatbots.
Word-Level Explanations for Analyzing Bias in Text-to-Image Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Text-to-image models take a sentence (i.e., prompt) and generate images associated with this input prompt. These models have created award wining-art, videos, and even synthetic datasets. However, text-to-image (T2I) models can generate images that underrepresent minorities based on race and sex. This paper investigates which word in the input prompt is responsible for bias in generated images. We introduce a method for computing scores for each word in the prompt; these scores represent its influence on biases in the model's output. Our method follows the principle of \emph{explaining by removing}, leveraging masked language models to calculate the influence scores. We perform experiments on Stable Diffusion to demonstrate that our method identifies the replication of societal stereotypes in generated images.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SD 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Testing chatbots on the creation of encoders for audio conditioned image generation
All chatbot-designed audio encoders failed to align with CLIP text embeddings and produced incoherent images, while showing a surprising architectural similarity across chatbots.