A 90%-pruned few-shot Bengali model is reported to rival larger baselines on some tasks, but the reported F1 scores contradict the paper's own precision and recall values.
A Review of Bangla Natural Language Processing Tasks and the Utility of Transformer Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Bangla -- ranked as the 6th most widely spoken language across the world (https://www.ethnologue.com/guides/ethnologue200), with 230 million native speakers -- is still considered as a low-resource language in the natural language processing (NLP) community. With three decades of research, Bangla NLP (BNLP) is still lagging behind mainly due to the scarcity of resources and the challenges that come with it. There is sparse work in different areas of BNLP; however, a thorough survey reporting previous work and recent advances is yet to be done. In this study, we first provide a review of Bangla NLP tasks, resources, and tools available to the research community; we benchmark datasets collected from various platforms for nine NLP tasks using current state-of-the-art algorithms (i.e., transformer-based models). We provide comparative results for the studied NLP tasks by comparing monolingual vs. multilingual models of varying sizes. We report our results using both individual and consolidated datasets and provide data splits for future research. We reviewed a total of 108 papers and conducted 175 sets of experiments. Our results show promising performance using transformer-based models while highlighting the trade-off with computational costs. We hope that such a comprehensive survey will motivate the community to build on and further advance the research on Bangla NLP.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2026 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
BnBERT-iPET: Sparse Few-Shot Language Modeling for Bengali via Lottery Ticket Pruning
A 90%-pruned few-shot Bengali model is reported to rival larger baselines on some tasks, but the reported F1 scores contradict the paper's own precision and recall values.