A conceptual modeling paper claims thinging machines are more appropriate than UML or textual descriptions, but offers only qualitative side-by-side examples as support.
Conceptual modeling supported by text analysis,
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.SE 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Textual-Based vs. Thinging Machines Conceptual Modeling
A conceptual modeling paper claims thinging machines are more appropriate than UML or textual descriptions, but offers only qualitative side-by-side examples as support.