HateBench shows current hate speech detectors miss a meaningful share of LLM-generated hate and are evaded by word-level edits, enabling automated hate campaigns.
Robust Hate Speech Detection in Social Media: A Cross-Dataset Empirical Evaluation
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The automatic detection of hate speech online is an active research area in NLP. Most of the studies to date are based on social media datasets that contribute to the creation of hate speech detection models trained on them. However, data creation processes contain their own biases, and models inherently learn from these dataset-specific biases. In this paper, we perform a large-scale cross-dataset comparison where we fine-tune language models on different hate speech detection datasets. This analysis shows how some datasets are more generalisable than others when used as training data. Crucially, our experiments show how combining hate speech detection datasets can contribute to the development of robust hate speech detection models. This robustness holds even when controlling by data size and compared with the best individual datasets.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CR 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
HateBench: Benchmarking Hate Speech Detectors on LLM-Generated Content and Hate Campaigns
HateBench shows current hate speech detectors miss a meaningful share of LLM-generated hate and are evaded by word-level edits, enabling automated hate campaigns.