ML4AVD research remains locked into binary function-level classification of C/C++ vulnerabilities because twelve pain points in the pipeline reinforce each other through feedback loops.
LLbezpeky: Leveraging large language models for vulnerability detection,
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Fine-tuned decoder-only LLMs fall into a Semantic Trap on vulnerability detection, achieving high scores on unpaired normal code but failing on paired vulnerable-patched code, semantic perturbations, and gap analysis, while reasoning supervision reduces symptoms at the cost of recall.
citing papers explorer
-
Direction for Detection: A Survey of Automated Vulnerability Detection and all of its Pain Points
ML4AVD research remains locked into binary function-level classification of C/C++ vulnerabilities because twelve pain points in the pipeline reinforce each other through feedback loops.
-
Do Fine-Tuned LLMs Understand Vulnerabilities? An Investigation into the Semantic Trap
Fine-tuned decoder-only LLMs fall into a Semantic Trap on vulnerability detection, achieving high scores on unpaired normal code but failing on paired vulnerable-patched code, semantic perturbations, and gap analysis, while reasoning supervision reduces symptoms at the cost of recall.