Pith. sign in

HOMFLY and superpolynomials for figure eight knot in all symmetric and antisymmetric representations

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Explicit answer is given for the HOMFLY polynomial of the figure eight knot $4_1$ in arbitrary symmetric representation R=[p]. It generalizes the old answers for p=1 and 2 and the recently derived results for p=3,4, which are fully consistent with the Ooguri-Vafa conjecture. The answer can be considered as a quantization of the \sigma_R = \sigma_{[1]}^{|R|} identity for the "special" polynomials (they define the leading asymptotics of HOMFLY at q=1), and arises in a form, convenient for comparison with the representation of the Jones polynomials as sums of dilogarithm ratios. In particular, we construct a difference equation ("non-commutative A-polynomial") in the representation variable p. Simple symmetry transformation provides also a formula for arbitrary antisymmetric (fundamental) representation R=[1^p], which also passes some obvious checks. Also straightforward is a deformation from HOMFLY to superpolynomials. Further generalizations seem possible to arbitrary Young diagrams R, but these expressions are harder to test because of the lack of alternative results, even partial.

fields

hep-th 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

Two roles of Alexander in two Kashaev phases

hep-th · 2026-05-29 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Alexander polynomials appear in two opposite roles in two Kashaev phases of Chern-Simons theory due to co-existing branches in the quasiclassical limit with non-trivial versus vanishing classical actions.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Two roles of Alexander in two Kashaev phases hep-th · 2026-05-29 · unverdicted · none · ref 56 · internal anchor

    Alexander polynomials appear in two opposite roles in two Kashaev phases of Chern-Simons theory due to co-existing branches in the quasiclassical limit with non-trivial versus vanishing classical actions.