Simulations find that the inverse energy gap in 2D Edwards-Anderson spin glasses develops a fat-tailed distribution with infinite variance for large N, while the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model shows a finite-variance gap scaling roughly as N to the power -1/3.
Computational Bottlenecks of Quantum Annealing
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
A promising approach to solving hard binary optimisation problems is quantum adiabatic annealing (QA) in a transverse magnetic field. An instantaneous ground state --- initially a symmetric superposition of all possible assignments of $N$ qubits --- is closely tracked as it becomes more and more localised near the global minimum of the classical energy. Regions where the energy gap to excited states is small (e.g. at the phase transition) are the algorithm's bottlenecks. Here I show how for large problems the complexity becomes dominated by $O(\log N)$ bottlenecks inside the spin glass phase, where the gap scales as a stretched exponential. For smaller $N$, only the gap at the critical point is relevant, where it scales polynomially, as long as the phase transition is second order. This phenomenon is demonstrated rigorously for the two-pattern Gaussian Hopfield Model. Qualitative comparison with the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model leads to similar conclusions.
fields
cond-mat.dis-nn 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Energy gap of quantum spin glasses: a projection quantum Monte Carlo study
Simulations find that the inverse energy gap in 2D Edwards-Anderson spin glasses develops a fat-tailed distribution with infinite variance for large N, while the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model shows a finite-variance gap scaling roughly as N to the power -1/3.