Six LLMs show an equivalence-versus-process paradox: some match human surface behaviors but few replicate human decision pathways, so GABMs need dual-level validation before use in logistics research.
Toward LLM-Agent-Based Modeling of Transportation Systems: A Conceptual Framework
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In transportation system demand modeling and simulation, agent-based models and microsimulations are current state-of-the-art approaches. However, existing agent-based models still have some limitations on behavioral realism and resource demand that limit their applicability. In this study, leveraging the emerging technology of large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based agents, we propose a general LLM-agent-based modeling framework for transportation systems. We argue that LLM agents not only possess the essential capabilities to function as agents but also offer promising solutions to overcome some limitations of existing agent-based models. Our conceptual framework design closely replicates the decision-making and interaction processes and traits of human travelers within transportation networks, and we demonstrate that the proposed systems can meet critical behavioral criteria for decision-making and learning behaviors using related studies and a demonstrative example of LLM agents' learning and adjustment in the bottleneck setting. Although further refinement of the LLM-agent-based modeling framework is necessary, we believe that this approach has the potential to improve transportation system modeling and simulation.
fields
cs.MA 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Validating Generative Agent-Based Models for Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research
Six LLMs show an equivalence-versus-process paradox: some match human surface behaviors but few replicate human decision pathways, so GABMs need dual-level validation before use in logistics research.