Pith. sign in

Targeted attack on gpt-neo for the satml language model data extraction challenge

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Previous work has shown that Large Language Models are susceptible to so-called data extraction attacks. This allows an attacker to extract a sample that was contained in the training data, which has massive privacy implications. The construction of data extraction attacks is challenging, current attacks are quite inefficient, and there exists a significant gap in the extraction capabilities of untargeted attacks and memorization. Thus, targeted attacks are proposed, which identify if a given sample from the training data, is extractable from a model. In this work, we apply a targeted data extraction attack to the SATML2023 Language Model Training Data Extraction Challenge. We apply a two-step approach. In the first step, we maximise the recall of the model and are able to extract the suffix for 69% of the samples. In the second step, we use a classifier-based Membership Inference Attack on the generations. Our AutoSklearn classifier achieves a precision of 0.841. The full approach reaches a score of 0.405 recall at a 10% false positive rate, which is an improvement of 34% over the baseline of 0.301.

years

2026 2 2025 1

representative citing papers

The Poisoned Chalice of LLM Evaluation Report

cs.SE · 2026-07-08 · conditional · novelty 4.0

A competition report showing that white-box membership inference attacks on code LLMs mostly fail (AUC ~0.56–0.61) except for one structure-aware method (SERSEM, AUC ~0.77) that generalizes to a held-out model.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.

  • MATRIX: Multi-Layer Code Watermarking via Dual-Channel Constrained Parity-Check Encoding cs.CR · 2026-04-17 · unverdicted · none · ref 16

    MATRIX embeds multi-layer watermarks in LLM-generated code via dual-channel constrained parity-check encoding, achieving 99.2% detection accuracy with 0-0.14% functionality loss and 7.7-26.67% better attack robustness than prior methods.

  • Data Compressibility Quantifies LLM Memorization cs.CL · 2025-07-08 · unverdicted · none · ref 24

    Set-level data entropy estimators show linear correlation with LLM memorization scores, forming the Entropy-Memorization Linearity.

  • The Poisoned Chalice of LLM Evaluation Report cs.SE · 2026-07-08 · conditional · none · ref 2 · internal anchor

    A competition report showing that white-box membership inference attacks on code LLMs mostly fail (AUC ~0.56–0.61) except for one structure-aware method (SERSEM, AUC ~0.77) that generalizes to a held-out model.