TESS data show stochastic low-frequency variability dominates in most extreme helium stars, with characteristic timescales of 0.5-10 days correlating to stellar parameters and matching subsurface convection predictions.
Gaia Data Release 2: using Gaia parallaxes
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The second Gaia data release (GDR2) provides precise five-parameter astrometric data (positions, proper motions and parallaxes) for an unprecedented amount of sources (more than $1.3$ billion, mostly stars). The use of this wealth of astrometric data comes with a specific challenge: how does one properly infer from these data the astrophysical parameters of interest? The main - but not only - focus of this paper is the issue of the estimation of distances from parallaxes, possibly combined with other information. We start with a critical review of the methods traditionally used to obtain distances from parallaxes and their shortcomings. Then we provide guidelines on how to use parallaxes more efficiently to estimate distances by using Bayesian methods. In particular also we show that negative parallaxes, or parallaxes with relatively larger uncertainties still contain valuable information. Finally, we provide examples that show more generally how to use astrometric data for parameter estimation, including the combination of proper motions and parallaxes and the handling of covariances in the uncertainties. The paper contains examples based on simulated Gaia data to illustrate the problems and the solutions proposed. Furthermore, the developments and methods proposed in the paper are linked to a set of tutorials included in the Gaia archive documentation that provide practical examples and a good starting point for the application of the recommendations to actual problems. In all cases the source code for the analysis methods is provided. Our main recommendation is to always treat the derivation of (astro-) physical parameters from astrometric data, in particular when parallaxes are involved, as an inference problem which should preferably be handled with a full Bayesian approach.
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
NGC 2453 cluster distance is 4.7 kpc with age 40-50 Myr; planetary nebula NGC 2452 is a non-member foreground object.
Overview of astronomical distance scales from solar system to extragalactic, emphasizing trigonometric stellar distances and advances from Hipparcos and Gaia.
citing papers explorer
-
TESS Observations of Stochastic Low-frequency Variability in Extreme Helium Stars
TESS data show stochastic low-frequency variability dominates in most extreme helium stars, with characteristic timescales of 0.5-10 days correlating to stellar parameters and matching subsurface convection predictions.
-
Solving the distance discrepancy for the open cluster NGC 2453. The planetary nebula NGC 2452 is not a cluster member
NGC 2453 cluster distance is 4.7 kpc with age 40-50 Myr; planetary nebula NGC 2452 is a non-member foreground object.
-
Astronomical distance scales in the Gaia era
Overview of astronomical distance scales from solar system to extragalactic, emphasizing trigonometric stellar distances and advances from Hipparcos and Gaia.