Two-stage PINNs solve three analytical Grad-Shafranov benchmarks to O(10^-8) accuracy, far below the 10^-3 to 10^-4 errors of earlier PINN solvers cited in the paper.
Evaluation and Verification of Physics-Informed Neural Models of the Grad-Shafranov Equation
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Our contributions are motivated by fusion reactors that rely on maintaining magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equilibrium, where the balance between plasma pressure and confining magnetic fields is required for stable operation. In axisymmetric tokamak reactors in particular, and under the assumption of toroidal symmetry, this equilibrium can be mathematically modelled using the Grad-Shafranov Equation (GSE). Recent works have demonstrated the potential of using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to model the GSE. Existing studies did not examine realistic scenarios in which a single network generalizes to a variety of boundary conditions. Addressing that limitation, we evaluate a PINN architecture that incorporates boundary points as network inputs. Additionally, we compare PINN model accuracy and inference speeds with a Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) model. Finding the PINN model to be the most performant, and accurate in our setting, we use the network verification tool Marabou to perform a range of verification tasks. Although we find some discrepancies between evaluations of the networks natively in PyTorch, compared to via Marabou, we are able to demonstrate useful and practical verification workflows. Our study is the first investigation of verification of such networks.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
physics.plasm-ph 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for High-Precision Grad-Shafranov Equilibrium Reconstruction
Two-stage PINNs solve three analytical Grad-Shafranov benchmarks to O(10^-8) accuracy, far below the 10^-3 to 10^-4 errors of earlier PINN solvers cited in the paper.