Across eight languages, n-gram metrics such as ROUGE correlate less with human ratings in fusional languages than in isolating and agglutinative ones, while the neural metric COMET correlates better, especially in low-resource languages.
CREAM: Comparison-Based Reference-Free ELO-Ranked Automatic Evaluation for Meeting Summarization
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have spurred interest in automatic evaluation methods for summarization, offering a faster, more cost-effective alternative to human evaluation. However, existing methods often fall short when applied to complex tasks like long-context summarizations and dialogue-based meeting summarizations. In this paper, we introduce CREAM (Comparison-Based Reference-Free Elo-Ranked Automatic Evaluation for Meeting Summarization), a novel framework that addresses the unique challenges of evaluating meeting summaries. CREAM leverages a combination of chain-of-thought reasoning and key facts alignment to assess conciseness and completeness of model-generated summaries without requiring reference. By employing an ELO ranking system, our approach provides a robust mechanism for comparing the quality of different models or prompt configurations.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond N-Grams: Rethinking Evaluation Metrics and Strategies for Multilingual Abstractive Summarization
Across eight languages, n-gram metrics such as ROUGE correlate less with human ratings in fusional languages than in isolating and agglutinative ones, while the neural metric COMET correlates better, especially in low-resource languages.