pith. sign in

Compositional entailment learning for hyperbolic vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06912

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CV 2 cs.LG 1

years

2026 3

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 3

roles

dataset 1

polarities

use dataset 1

representative citing papers

Hyperbolic Concept Bottleneck Models

cs.LG · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

HypCBM reformulates concept activations as geometric containment in hyperbolic space to produce sparse, hierarchy-aware signals that match Euclidean models trained on 20 times more data.

HSG: Hyperbolic Scene Graph

cs.CV · 2026-04-19 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Hyperbolic Scene Graph (HSG) learns embeddings in hyperbolic space for better hierarchical structure in scene graphs, achieving graph IoU of 33.51 versus 25.37 for the best Euclidean baseline.

GeoWorld: Geometric World Models

cs.CV · 2026-02-26 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

GeoWorld applies hyperbolic geometry to JEPA world models and introduces geometric reinforcement learning, reporting modest success-rate gains of ~3% and ~2% on 3- and 4-step planning tasks versus V-JEPA 2.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.

  • Hyperbolic Concept Bottleneck Models cs.LG · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · none · ref 35 · 2 links

    HypCBM reformulates concept activations as geometric containment in hyperbolic space to produce sparse, hierarchy-aware signals that match Euclidean models trained on 20 times more data.

  • HSG: Hyperbolic Scene Graph cs.CV · 2026-04-19 · unverdicted · none · ref 41

    Hyperbolic Scene Graph (HSG) learns embeddings in hyperbolic space for better hierarchical structure in scene graphs, achieving graph IoU of 33.51 versus 25.37 for the best Euclidean baseline.

  • GeoWorld: Geometric World Models cs.CV · 2026-02-26 · unverdicted · none · ref 55

    GeoWorld applies hyperbolic geometry to JEPA world models and introduces geometric reinforcement learning, reporting modest success-rate gains of ~3% and ~2% on 3- and 4-step planning tasks versus V-JEPA 2.