Aggregated local explanations from LIME, SHAP, and DiCE can flag group-level unfairness, but the results shift with aggregation method and protected attribute removal, so explanations must be used cautiously as bias detectors.
Fairness Aware Counterfactuals for Subgroups
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In this work, we present Fairness Aware Counterfactuals for Subgroups (FACTS), a framework for auditing subgroup fairness through counterfactual explanations. We start with revisiting (and generalizing) existing notions and introducing new, more refined notions of subgroup fairness. We aim to (a) formulate different aspects of the difficulty of individuals in certain subgroups to achieve recourse, i.e. receive the desired outcome, either at the micro level, considering members of the subgroup individually, or at the macro level, considering the subgroup as a whole, and (b) introduce notions of subgroup fairness that are robust, if not totally oblivious, to the cost of achieving recourse. We accompany these notions with an efficient, model-agnostic, highly parameterizable, and explainable framework for evaluating subgroup fairness. We demonstrate the advantages, the wide applicability, and the efficiency of our approach through a thorough experimental evaluation of different benchmark datasets.
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Explanations as Bias Detectors: A Critical Study of Local Post-hoc XAI Methods for Fairness Exploration
Aggregated local explanations from LIME, SHAP, and DiCE can flag group-level unfairness, but the results shift with aggregation method and protected attribute removal, so explanations must be used cautiously as bias detectors.