A framework using sparse autoencoders decomposes concept-level forgetting in supervised continual learning into apparent deletion, recoverability, and decodability, showing substantial recoverability under linearity and degrading decodability with added tasks.
Putting a Face to Forgetting: Continual Learning meets Mechanistic Interpretability
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Catastrophic forgetting in continual learning is often measured at the performance or last-layer representation level, overlooking the underlying mechanisms. We introduce a mechanistic framework that offers a geometric interpretation of catastrophic forgetting as the result of transformations to the encoding of individual features. These transformations can lead to forgetting by reducing the allocated capacity of features or by disrupting their readout by downstream computations. Analysis of a tractable toy model formalizes this view, allowing us to identify best- and worst-case scenarios. Through experiments on this model, we empirically test our formal analysis and highlight the detrimental effect of depth. Finally, we demonstrate how our framework can be used in the analysis of practical models through the use of Crosscoders. We do so through a case study example of a Vision Transformer trained on sequential CIFAR-10. Our work provides a new, feature-centric vocabulary for continual learning.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Lost or Hidden? A Concept-Level Forgetting in Supervised Continual Learning
A framework using sparse autoencoders decomposes concept-level forgetting in supervised continual learning into apparent deletion, recoverability, and decodability, showing substantial recoverability under linearity and degrading decodability with added tasks.