Pith. sign in

Agent Planning Benchmark: A Diagnostic Framework for Planning Capabilities in LLM Agents

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Planning is central to LLM agents: before acting, an agent must decompose goals, select tools, reason over constraints, and decide when a task is infeasible. Yet existing agent evaluations often report only end-to-end success, making it difficult to determine whether failures stem from planning or execution. We introduce Agent Planning Benchmark (APB), a planning-specific diagnostic benchmark with 4,209 multimodal cases across 22 domains and five settings, covering holistic planning, feedback-conditioned step-wise planning, and robustness under extraneous tools, broken tools, and unsolvable tasks. Across 12 MLLMs, APB reveals systematic weaknesses in long-horizon planning, tool-noise robustness, calibrated refusal, and inference-time refinement. We further validate APB on 200 ToolSandbox tasks and 200 $\tau^2$-bench tasks, where APB-guided refinement consistently improves plan correctness, plan grade, and downstream execution metrics across three representative models. APB thus serves as an upstream diagnostic complement to execution benchmarks. The APB benchmark and code are available in \href{https://github.com/Mikivishy/AgentPlanningBenchmark}{this URL}.

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

$A^2E$ : An End-to-End Agent Auditing Engine

cs.AI · 2026-08-07 · conditional · novelty 4.0

A2E is an end-to-end, trace-based engine for auditing LLM agent harnesses, and a 9x23 evaluation sweep shows no harness dominates and correctness alone hides large efficiency and process differences.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • $A^2E$ : An End-to-End Agent Auditing Engine cs.AI · 2026-08-07 · conditional · none · ref 2023 · internal anchor

    A2E is an end-to-end, trace-based engine for auditing LLM agent harnesses, and a 9x23 evaluation sweep shows no harness dominates and correctness alone hides large efficiency and process differences.