Pith. sign in

Learning safety critics via a non-contractive binary bellman operator

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

The inability to naturally enforce safety in Reinforcement Learning (RL), with limited failures, is a core challenge impeding its use in real-world applications. One notion of safety of vast practical relevance is the ability to avoid (unsafe) regions of the state space. Though such a safety goal can be captured by an action-value-like function, a.k.a. safety critics, the associated operator lacks the desired contraction and uniqueness properties that the classical Bellman operator enjoys. In this work, we overcome the non-contractiveness of safety critic operators by leveraging that safety is a binary property. To that end, we study the properties of the binary safety critic associated with a deterministic dynamical system that seeks to avoid reaching an unsafe region. We formulate the corresponding binary Bellman equation (B2E) for safety and study its properties. While the resulting operator is still non-contractive, we fully characterize its fixed points representing--except for a spurious solution--maximal persistently safe regions of the state space that can always avoid failure. We provide an algorithm that, by design, leverages axiomatic knowledge of safe data to avoid spurious fixed points.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.RO 1

years

2024 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Q-learning-based Model-free Safety Filter

cs.RO · 2024-11-29 · reject · novelty 6.0

A Q-learning safety filter with a time-dependent reward blocks unsafe actions from arbitrary task policies, but its theoretical guarantee is not valid as written.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Q-learning-based Model-free Safety Filter cs.RO · 2024-11-29 · reject · none · ref 24 · internal anchor

    A Q-learning safety filter with a time-dependent reward blocks unsafe actions from arbitrary task policies, but its theoretical guarantee is not valid as written.