FENNM solves 1D PDEs by minimizing a finite-element weak-form residual with Lagrange test functions and a neural network trial solution, including flux terms at element boundaries.
Function approximation by deep networks
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We show that deep networks are better than shallow networks at approximating functions that can be expressed as a composition of functions described by a directed acyclic graph, because the deep networks can be designed to have the same compositional structure, while a shallow network cannot exploit this knowledge. Thus, the blessing of compositionality mitigates the curse of dimensionality. On the other hand, a theorem called good propagation of errors allows to `lift' theorems about shallow networks to those about deep networks with an appropriate choice of norms, smoothness, etc. We illustrate this in three contexts where each channel in the deep network calculates a spherical polynomial, a non-smooth ReLU network, or another zonal function network related closely with the ReLU network.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CE 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Finite Element Neural Network Method: One Dimensional Study
FENNM solves 1D PDEs by minimizing a finite-element weak-form residual with Lagrange test functions and a neural network trial solution, including flux terms at element boundaries.