Multi-agent debate mostly underperforms simple chain-of-thought baselines when tested broadly, while randomly mixing different models into the debate reliably improves performance.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Stop Overvaluing Multi-Agent Debate -- We Must Rethink Evaluation and Embrace Model Heterogeneity
Multi-agent debate mostly underperforms simple chain-of-thought baselines when tested broadly, while randomly mixing different models into the debate reliably improves performance.