Pith. sign in

SoK: A Systems Perspective on Compound AI Threats and Countermeasures

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Large language models (LLMs) used across enterprises often use proprietary models and operate on sensitive inputs and data. The wide range of attack vectors identified in prior research - targeting various software and hardware components used in training and inference - makes it extremely challenging to enforce confidentiality and integrity policies. As we advance towards constructing compound AI inference pipelines that integrate multiple large language models (LLMs), the attack surfaces expand significantly. Attackers now focus on the AI algorithms as well as the software and hardware components associated with these systems. While current research often examines these elements in isolation, we find that combining cross-layer attack observations can enable powerful end-to-end attacks with minimal assumptions about the threat model. Given, the sheer number of existing attacks at each layer, we need a holistic and systemized understanding of different attack vectors at each layer. This SoK discusses different software and hardware attacks applicable to compound AI systems and demonstrates how combining multiple attack mechanisms can reduce the threat model assumptions required for an isolated attack. Next, we systematize the ML attacks in lines with the Mitre Att&ck framework to better position each attack based on the threat model. Finally, we outline the existing countermeasures for both software and hardware layers and discuss the necessity of a comprehensive defense strategy to enable the secure and high-performance deployment of compound AI systems.

fields

cs.CR 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

The Automation Advantage in AI Red Teaming

cs.CR · 2025-04-28 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Automated LLM red-teaming achieves higher success rates than manual prompting (69.5% vs 47.6%) but manual solves are faster when they succeed, according to 214,271 attack attempts on the Crucible platform.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • The Automation Advantage in AI Red Teaming cs.CR · 2025-04-28 · conditional · none · ref 5 · internal anchor

    Automated LLM red-teaming achieves higher success rates than manual prompting (69.5% vs 47.6%) but manual solves are faster when they succeed, according to 214,271 attack attempts on the Crucible platform.