Compared with whole-body marker models, a pelvis-marker-only estimate yields roughly double the force residual in dynamic activities, while Kalman-filter fusion of ground reaction forces did not beat the whole-body marker model.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
q-bio.QM 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Comparative analysis of whole-body center-of-mass estimation methods in dynamic and static activities using marker-based systems
Compared with whole-body marker models, a pelvis-marker-only estimate yields roughly double the force residual in dynamic activities, while Kalman-filter fusion of ground reaction forces did not beat the whole-body marker model.