Soohak is a 439-problem mathematician-curated benchmark where frontier LLMs reach at most 30.4% on research math challenges and no model exceeds 50% on refusal for ill-posed problems.
Riemann-Bench: A Benchmark for Moonshot Mathematics
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Recent AI systems have achieved gold-medal-level performance on the International Mathematical Olympiad, demonstrating remarkable proficiency at competition-style problem solving. However, competition mathematics represents only a narrow slice of mathematical reasoning: problems are drawn from limited domains, require minimal advanced machinery, and can often reward insightful tricks over deep theoretical knowledge. We introduce Riemann-Bench, a private benchmark of expert-curated problems designed to evaluate AI systems on research-level mathematics that goes far beyond the olympiad frontier. Problems are authored by Ivy League mathematics professors, graduate students, and PhD-holding IMO medalists, and routinely took their authors weeks to solve independently. Each problem undergoes double-blind verification by two independent domain experts who must solve the problem from scratch, and yields a unique, closed-form solution assessed by programmatic verifiers. We evaluate frontier models as unconstrained research agents, with full access to coding tools, search, and open-ended reasoning, using an unbiased statistical estimator computed over 100 independent runs per problem. Our results reveal that all frontier models currently score below 10%, exposing a substantial gap between olympiad-level problem solving and genuine research-level mathematical reasoning. By keeping the benchmark fully private, we ensure that measured performance reflects authentic mathematical capability rather than memorization of training data.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
The authors release ResearchMath-14k, the largest dataset of research-level math problems, and demonstrate that agent-filtered reasoning trajectories from open models improve fine-tuned Qwen3 models by 9.2 points on average.
Frontier LLMs achieve 95-100% accuracy on AMC/AIME problems but recover far fewer distinct valid strategies than human references, while collectively generating 50 novel strategies.
citing papers explorer
-
Soohak: A Mathematician-Curated Benchmark for Evaluating Research-level Math Capabilities of LLMs
Soohak is a 439-problem mathematician-curated benchmark where frontier LLMs reach at most 30.4% on research math challenges and no model exceeds 50% on refusal for ill-posed problems.
-
ResearchMath-14K: Scaling Research-Level Mathematics via Agents
The authors release ResearchMath-14k, the largest dataset of research-level math problems, and demonstrate that agent-filtered reasoning trajectories from open models improve fine-tuned Qwen3 models by 9.2 points on average.
-
Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating Strategy Diversity in LLM Mathematical Reasoning
Frontier LLMs achieve 95-100% accuracy on AMC/AIME problems but recover far fewer distinct valid strategies than human references, while collectively generating 50 novel strategies.