CEX-DEX arbitrage on Ethereum extracted an estimated 233.8M USD in 19 months, increasingly concentrated among three searchers tied to dominant block builders.
Measuring Arbitrage Losses and Profitability of AMM Liquidity
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This paper presents the results of a comprehensive empirical study of losses to arbitrageurs (following the formalization of loss-versus-rebalancing by [Milionis et al., 2022]) incurred by liquidity providers on automated market makers (AMMs). We show that those losses exceed the fees earned by liquidity providers across many of the largest AMM liquidity pools (on Uniswap). Remarkably, we also find that the Uniswap v2 pools are more profitable for passive LPs than their Uniswap v3 counterparts. We also investigate how arbitrage losses change with block times. As expected, arbitrage losses decrease when block production is faster. However, the rate of the decline varies significantly across different trading pairs. For instance, when comparing 100ms block times to Ethereum's current 12-second block times, the decrease in losses to arbitrageurs ranges between 20% to 70%, depending on the specific trading pair.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CR 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Measuring CEX-DEX Extracted Value and Searcher Profitability: The Darkest of the MEV Dark Forest
CEX-DEX arbitrage on Ethereum extracted an estimated 233.8M USD in 19 months, increasingly concentrated among three searchers tied to dominant block builders.