A replication study of 22 highly cited AI papers finds that sharing both code and data is strongly associated with successful reproduction (86% vs 33% for data-only).
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Open Science in AI: A Replication Study
A replication study of 22 highly cited AI papers finds that sharing both code and data is strongly associated with successful reproduction (86% vs 33% for data-only).