This is a review of galaxy morphology classification, providing an updated crosswalk of terminologies, not a new scientific result.
Grand Design vs. Multi-Armed Spiral Galaxies: Dependence on Galaxy Structure
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We developed an algorithm to use Galaxy Zoo 3D spiral arm masks produced by citizen scientist volunteers to semi-automatically classify spiral galaxies as either multi-armed or grand design spirals. Our final sample consists of 299 multi-armed and 245 grand design galaxies. On average, the grand design galaxies have smaller stellar masses than the multi-armed galaxies. For a given stellar mass, the grand design galaxies have larger concentrations, earlier Hubble types, smaller half-light radii, and larger central surface mass densities than the multi-armed galaxies. Lower mass galaxies of both arm classes have later Hubble types and lower concentrations than higher mass galaxies. In our sample, a higher fraction of grand design galaxies have classical bulges rather than pseudo-bulges, compared to multi-armed galaxies. These results are consistent with theoretical models and simulations which suggest that dense classical bulges support the development and/or longevity of 2-armed spiral patterns. Similar specific star formation rates are found in multi-armed and grand design galaxies with similar stellar masses and concentrations. This implies that the specific star formation rates in spiral galaxies is a function of concentration and stellar mass, but independent of the number of spiral arms. Our classifications are consistent with arm counts from the Galaxy Zoo 2 project and published m=3 Fourier amplitudes.
fields
astro-ph.GA 1years
2025 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Morphological Classification of Galaxies
This is a review of galaxy morphology classification, providing an updated crosswalk of terminologies, not a new scientific result.