Loss-based pruning of training data to limit facts and flatten their frequency distribution enables a 110M-parameter GPT-2 model to memorize 1.3 times more entity facts than standard training, matching a 1.3B-parameter model on the full dataset.
Understanding llm behaviors via compression: Data generation, knowledge acquisition and scaling laws
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
other 1
citation-polarity summary
roles
other 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
Controlled experiments show language models extract correct answers from contradictory data only when errors are structurally incoherent, supporting the hypothesis that gradient descent selects the most compressible answer cluster.
Deep sequence models develop geometric memory in embeddings that encodes novel global relationships, transforming l-fold composition tasks into 1-step navigation via a natural spectral bias connected to Node2Vec.
citing papers explorer
-
Cram Less to Fit More: Training Data Pruning Improves Memorization of Facts
Loss-based pruning of training data to limit facts and flatten their frequency distribution enables a 110M-parameter GPT-2 model to memorize 1.3 times more entity facts than standard training, matching a 1.3B-parameter model on the full dataset.
-
Truth as a Compression Artifact in Language Model Training
Controlled experiments show language models extract correct answers from contradictory data only when errors are structurally incoherent, supporting the hypothesis that gradient descent selects the most compressible answer cluster.
-
Deep sequence models tend to memorize geometrically; it is unclear why
Deep sequence models develop geometric memory in embeddings that encodes novel global relationships, transforming l-fold composition tasks into 1-step navigation via a natural spectral bias connected to Node2Vec.