pith. sign in

A multilingual hallucination benchmark: MultiWikiQHalluA

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Most hallucination evaluations focus on English, leaving it unclear whether findings transfer to lower-resource languages. We investigate faithfulness hallucinations, defined as model-generated content that is fluent and plausible but diverges from the provided input or is internally inconsistent. Leveraging the multilingual MultiWikiQA dataset, we utilize the LettuceDetect framework to create synthetic hallucination datasets for 306 languages, from which we train token-level hallucination classifiers for 30 European languages. In this work, we present evaluations of model hallucinations on a selection of languages: English, Danish, German, and Icelandic. Using these classifiers, we evaluate the hallucination rates for Qwen3-0.6B, Qwen3-14B, Gemma-3-12B-IT, cogito-v1-preview-qwen-32B, and cogito-v1-preview-llama-70B. Our classifiers reveal notably higher hallucination rates for Qwen3-0.6B (up to 60\% of answers containing at least one hallucination, peaking in Icelandic) and generally lower rates for larger models, with cogito-v1-preview-qwen-32B and cogito-v1-preview-llama-70B performing best on most languages. Hallucination rates are consistently higher for lower-resource languages, particularly Icelandic.

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

A multilingual hallucination benchmark: MultiWikiQHalluA

cs.CL · 2026-05-04 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Synthetic multilingual hallucination datasets and classifiers show higher hallucination rates for the 0.6B Qwen3 model (up to 60%) and for lower-resource languages like Icelandic compared with larger models.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • A multilingual hallucination benchmark: MultiWikiQHalluA cs.CL · 2026-05-04 · unverdicted · none · ref 2 · internal anchor

    Synthetic multilingual hallucination datasets and classifiers show higher hallucination rates for the 0.6B Qwen3 model (up to 60%) and for lower-resource languages like Icelandic compared with larger models.