A Fair Equality of Chances-based framework decomposes GenAI unfairness into harms/benefits, morally arbitrary factors, and morally decisive factors to improve measurement validity.
Position: Measure Dataset Diversity, Don't Just Claim It
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Machine learning (ML) datasets, often perceived as neutral, inherently encapsulate abstract and disputed social constructs. Dataset curators frequently employ value-laden terms such as diversity, bias, and quality to characterize datasets. Despite their prevalence, these terms lack clear definitions and validation. Our research explores the implications of this issue by analyzing "diversity" across 135 image and text datasets. Drawing from social sciences, we apply principles from measurement theory to identify considerations and offer recommendations for conceptualizing, operationalizing, and evaluating diversity in datasets. Our findings have broader implications for ML research, advocating for a more nuanced and precise approach to handling value-laden properties in dataset construction.
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Toward Valid Measurement Of (Un)fairness For Generative AI: A Proposal For Systematization Through The Lens Of Fair Equality of Chances
A Fair Equality of Chances-based framework decomposes GenAI unfairness into harms/benefits, morally arbitrary factors, and morally decisive factors to improve measurement validity.