A position paper reviewing why evaluating AI explanations is difficult, illustrated by the author's bias-detection and human-survey case studies and by concept-drift explanation methods.
Investigating the Relationship Between Debiasing and Artifact Removal using Saliency Maps
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The widespread adoption of machine learning systems has raised critical concerns about fairness and bias, making mitigating harmful biases essential for AI development. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between debiasing and removing artifacts in neural networks for computer vision tasks. First, we introduce a set of novel XAI-based metrics that analyze saliency maps to assess shifts in a model's decision-making process. Then, we demonstrate that successful debiasing methods systematically redirect model focus away from protected attributes. Finally, we show that techniques originally developed for artifact removal can be effectively repurposed for improving fairness. These findings provide evidence for the existence of a bidirectional connection between ensuring fairness and removing artifacts corresponding to protected attributes.
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Challenges in Evaluating Explanation Methods for Static and Evolving Data
A position paper reviewing why evaluating AI explanations is difficult, illustrated by the author's bias-detection and human-survey case studies and by concept-drift explanation methods.