AI accountability efforts are undermined by five decoys that create illusions of progress while co-constituting the extractive political economy of the AI Project.
American Sociological Review69(3), 319–344 (2004) https://doi
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Reviews asymptotic normality conditions for counting-process REMs under varying limits of n and T, with simulations illustrating effects of modeling choices like windowing and log transforms on Cox-type models.
citing papers explorer
-
Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability
AI accountability efforts are undermined by five decoys that create illusions of progress while co-constituting the extractive political economy of the AI Project.
-
A Counting Process View of Relational Event Models: Practical Asymptotics
Reviews asymptotic normality conditions for counting-process REMs under varying limits of n and T, with simulations illustrating effects of modeling choices like windowing and log transforms on Cox-type models.